The Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Primary Cardiac Amyloidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 67 year old female presented to her family physician with a five month history of progressing shortness of breath and fatigue. Two weeks later, the patient followed-up with cardiology. An echocardiogram revealed normal biventricular systolic function, pulmonary hypertension and mild tricuspid regurgitation. Clinically, the patient had bilateral pedal edema, evidence of pleural effusion and an elevated jugular venous pressure (JVP). Five weeks later she was admitted to hospital for further testing as there was a marked change in her condition. In hospital, a series of investigations were performed including a pulmonary angiogram, thoracentesis, chest computed tomography (CT), venous Doppler of lower extremities and an endomyocardial biopsy. The endomyocardial biopsy demonstrated interstitial and vascular positivity for amyloid by Congo Red stain with apple green birefringence in polarized light. The patient was diagnosed with systemic primary amyloidosis (AL) with cardiac involvement. Primary amyloidosis results from an accumulation of immunoglobulin light chains due to a clonal B cell disorder, often multiple myeloma. Patients progress rapidly and the median survival of primary amyloidosis with heart involvement is 6 months. While the signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure may be recognized with ease, determining the underlying cause of the heart failure may be more difficult. Determination of the underlying cause of heart failure is essential as it will influence the management of the patient . Early intervention may have a significant impact on the patient's response to treatment, especially when the underlying condition involves a malignancy or infiltrative disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".