MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1886526583

Archivaria, the Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists, 57(2004); 59 (2005)

2006· article· en· W1886526583 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rajka Bućin

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Political sciencePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archivaria, časopis Društva kanadskih arhivista, u svesku br.57 (proljeće 2004) donosi blok članaka posvećenih temi godišnjeg skupa Društva, održanog u Torontu 2003.godine, a to je odnos povijesti i arhivistike.Iza toga slijede uobičajene rubrike -Kontrapunkt, Proučavanje dokumenata, Bilješke i komunikacija, s različitim stručnim radovima i osvrtima, a na kraju sveska nalaze se recenzije i prikazi knjiga i izložbi (147-172), kao i nekrolozi preminulim kolegama -Johnu Hallu Archeru i Donaldu Stuartu Richanu (173-180).Prvi od tri članka posvećena temi godišnjeg skupa kanadskih arhivista jest rad Toma Nesmitha s naslovom Što povijest ima s tim: ponovno razmatranje uloge povijesnog znanja u arhivističkom radu (What's History Got to Do With It?: Reconsidering the Place of Historical Knowledge in Archival Work), 1-27.Parafrazirajući riječi pjesme Tine Turner, Nesmith ukazuje na bitnu vezu između povijesnog znanja i arhivističkog rada, prikazujući pregledno različite etape razvoja tog odnosa tijekom povijesti kanadske arhivske službe, poglavito od sredine XX. st.Nesmith ukazuje na činjenicu da su počeci arhivske službe u Kanadi bili blisko povezani sa strukom povjesničara, povijesnim znanjima i metodologijom povijesnog istraživanja, pa su i arhivisti bili poglavito povjesničari.Povijesno znanje bilo je dovoljno za savladavanje problema koji su bili aktualni tijekom 1960-ih godina -vrednovanje, opis i korištenje.Tijekom 1970-ih došlo je do postupnog osamostaljenja struke i udaljavanja od povijesti.To je vrijeme kada se struka bavila uspostavljanjem standarda opisa, poboljšanjem procesa i tehnika za upravljanje arhivskim funkcijama, automatizacijom službe, elektroničkim zapisima, arhivskim zakonodavstvom, odnosom prema spisovodstvu, informacijskim upravljanjem i slično.U skladu s time, godišnji skupovi ACA-e organizirani su odvojeno od dotadašnjih skupova održavanih u zajedništvu s povjesničarima i općenito s društvenim i humanističkim znanstvenicima.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0220.008
Scholarly communication0.0150.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.123
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)Same topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207