Phylogeography of the longnose dace (<i>Rhinichthys</i> <i>cataractae</i>) species group in northwestern North America — the Nooksack dace problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae (Valenciennes, 1842); Cyprinidae) is one of the most widespread freshwater fishes in North America, and across its range there have been several divergent forms described that are of uncertain taxonomic status. One of these forms, the Nooksack dace, is found in southwestern British Columbia and adjacent portions of western Washington, and is distinguished from longnose dace by a lower number of lateral-line scales. We sequenced a total of approximately 1400 base pairs (bp) of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and noted that the longnose dace found west of the Continental Divide and Nooksack dace constituted reciprocally monophyletic clades that differed from each other by between 2% and 3% sequence divergence. Sequence analysis at two nuclear loci (the S7 ribosomal protein intron 1 (S7) and recombination activation gene 1 (RAG1)), however, showed no consistent difference between longnose dace and Nooksack dace and several alleles were shared between them. By contrast, consistent differences at both mtDNA and nuclear DNA loci were resolved between R. cataractae samples from east and west of the Continental Divide. The Nooksack dace does not appear to warrant separate taxonomic status from the longnose dace, but the mtDNA differences support its recognition as an important component of the evolutionary and biogeographic legacy of R. cataractae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".