MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Norton Model of a Distribution Network for Harmonic Evaluation

2011· article· en· W1887115771 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shehab Abdulwadood Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy science and technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmtpHarmonicCapacitorElectronic engineeringVoltageHarmonic analysisNetwork modelShunt (medical)Computer scienceEngineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Control theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringElectric power systemPower (physics)PhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a Norton model for modelling distribution networks where the system configuration is not fully known. Traditionally harmonic studies use complex distribution networks modelled by harmonic current sources for specific frequencies. Although this model has been proved to be adequate for some studies, this may not be adequate for other applications. When changing the operating conditions of the supply-side system, the harmonic currents injected by the distribution network might change and to investigate these harmonic currents, the Norton model is used. The change of operating condition is obtained by switching shunt capacitors. The estimated model can be used to analyze, for example, the effect of harmonic filters under different supply system configurations or operating conditions. The method of estimating the Norton models is illustrated on a test system, simulated on the well-known simulation program EMTP-ATPDraw. Key words : Norton model; Distribution network; Operating conditions; Harmonic currents and voltages

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy science and technologySame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207