MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1887136843 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp31

Abstract T P31: Microembolus (MES) Detection by TCD in Acute Stroke Service

2014· article· en· W1887136843 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aftab Ahmad, Carol Derksen, Esseddeeg Ghrooda, Ghazala Basir, Khurshid Khan, Ashfaq Shuaib, Maher Saqqur

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Interquartile rangeSubarachnoid hemorrhageMiddle cerebral arteryInternal medicineAcute strokeCardiologyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and purpose: One of the main applications of TCD in acute stroke is microembolic signal (MES) detection. Both Spectral display and M-mode can be used to detect MES using validated criteria published previously. MES is reported to be an independent risk factor for stroke. Our study’s aim is to evaluate the yield of TCD MES in an acute stroke service and if this correlate with stroke’s mechanism and recurrence of stroke. Methods: We did analysis of all stroke and TIA patients who were evaluated in the University of Alberta Hospital between jan2006- July 2013. The clinical information was collected from charts and TCD studies for MES detection were reviewed by Neurologists certified by American Society of Neuroimaging using validated criteria. All cases had bilateral TCD monitoring of MCA /ACA or PCA vessels. The positive emboli on spectrogram was defined based on the consensus criteria and the M mode one based on our previous published criteria. Positive MES TCD monitoring was defined by the presence of ≥1 MES on either hemisphere. RESULTS: 49 /455 patients(10.7%) were MES positive. Mean age was 54.7(StD ±20), Gender: 33/49( 67.3%)were male, Median duration of monitoring was 50minutes( interquartile range 27.5-60), the indication was TIA in 16/49( 32.7%) acute ischemic stroke in 32/49(65.3%) subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1/49(2%), 36/49( 73.5%) presented with motor weakness 4/49( 8.2%) with isolated vision disturbances, 45/49(91.9%) patients had anterior circulation related symptoms, whereas 4/49(8.2%) had posterior circulation related symptoms,17/49(34.7%) showed acute infarct on imaging 6/49(12.2%) showed both acute and chronic infarcts and 3/49(6.1%) showed chronic infarcts only, 12/49(24.5%) showed infarcts in multiple vessels territories, TOAST: 20/49(40.8%) had large vessel atherosclerosis(LVA), 14/49(28.6%)had cardioembolic(CE) cause, 8/49(16.3%) had other determined etiology and 7/49(14.3%) had cryptogenic stroke, 7/49(14.3%) had recurrent stroke and 1/49(2%) had recurrent TIA. Total no of MES in anterior circulation were 324. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that 1 out of every 10 patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA showed positive micro embolic signal on TCD monitoring. The high yield was mainly seen in LVA and CE stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→