MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Turkic Republics and Turkey: Economic and Business Dimensions

2011· article· en· W1888334254 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBelt and Road Initiative
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsGlobalizationPolitical scienceChinaPower (physics)EconomyEconomic powerHumanitiesCentral asiaBusinessEconomicsInternational tradeLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ever-increasing globalization in last century is enforcing many countries to come together and create organizations to take advantage of a greater power in the global stage both in political and economic issues. Regional organizations are one form of such organizations. In addition to many of such groups, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is an intergovernmental mutual-security organization which was founded in 2001 by the leaders of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. In a short period of time since then SCO has proved itself to be a powerful organization promising to be an authority in Central Asian region. The research at hand is formed to investigate the development of this organization along with its effect on Turkey as well as the member countries. This effect is also analyzed in two dimensions. The place of SCO in region is analyzed not only in terms of economic side but also the business side. The fact that business and economics are difficult to isolate from each other, makes it a necessity to use this approach, thus, making this study a valuable source. Key words: Shanghai Cooperation Organization; Turkic Republics; Central Asia; Transitional EconomiesResume: Une mondialisation en constante croissance dans le siecle dernier oblige de nombreux pays de se reunir et de creer des organisations afin de profiter d'un plus grand pouvoir dans les evenements politiques et economiques au niveau international. Les organisations regionales sont une forme de ces organisations. A part de ces groupes, l’Organisation de cooperation de Shanghai (OCS) est une organisation intergouvernementale de securite mutuelle, fondee en 2001 par les dirigeants de la Chine, la Russie, le Kazakhstan, le Kirghizistan, le Tadjikistan et l'Ouzbekistan. Dans un court laps de temps depuis lors, OCS s'est averee etre une organisation puissante promettant d'etre une autorite en Asie centrale.La presente recherche est menee pour enqueter sur le developpement de cette organisation ainsi que son effet sur la Turquie et les pays membres. Cet effet est egalement analyse en deux dimensions. Le statut de l'OCS dans la region est analyse non seulement du point de vue economique mais aussi commercial. Le fait que le commerce et l'economie sont difficiles a isoler l’un de l’autre exige une necessite d'utiliser cette approche, ce qui rend cette etude une source precieuse. Mots cles: Organisation de cooperation de Shanghai; Republiques turques; Asie central; Economies transitionnelles

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it