MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Turkic Republics and Turkey: Economic and Business Dimensions

2011· article· en· W1888334254 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lütfü Şağbanşua, Nurettin Can

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBelt and Road Initiative
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsGlobalizationPolitical scienceChinaPower (physics)EconomyEconomic powerHumanitiesCentral asiaBusinessEconomicsInternational tradeLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ever-increasing globalization in last century is enforcing many countries to come together and create organizations to take advantage of a greater power in the global stage both in political and economic issues. Regional organizations are one form of such organizations. In addition to many of such groups, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is an intergovernmental mutual-security organization which was founded in 2001 by the leaders of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. In a short period of time since then SCO has proved itself to be a powerful organization promising to be an authority in Central Asian region. The research at hand is formed to investigate the development of this organization along with its effect on Turkey as well as the member countries. This effect is also analyzed in two dimensions. The place of SCO in region is analyzed not only in terms of economic side but also the business side. The fact that business and economics are difficult to isolate from each other, makes it a necessity to use this approach, thus, making this study a valuable source. Key words: Shanghai Cooperation Organization; Turkic Republics; Central Asia; Transitional EconomiesResume: Une mondialisation en constante croissance dans le siecle dernier oblige de nombreux pays de se reunir et de creer des organisations afin de profiter d'un plus grand pouvoir dans les evenements politiques et economiques au niveau international. Les organisations regionales sont une forme de ces organisations. A part de ces groupes, l’Organisation de cooperation de Shanghai (OCS) est une organisation intergouvernementale de securite mutuelle, fondee en 2001 par les dirigeants de la Chine, la Russie, le Kazakhstan, le Kirghizistan, le Tadjikistan et l'Ouzbekistan. Dans un court laps de temps depuis lors, OCS s'est averee etre une organisation puissante promettant d'etre une autorite en Asie centrale.La presente recherche est menee pour enqueter sur le developpement de cette organisation ainsi que son effet sur la Turquie et les pays membres. Cet effet est egalement analyse en deux dimensions. Le statut de l'OCS dans la region est analyse non seulement du point de vue economique mais aussi commercial. Le fait que le commerce et l'economie sont difficiles a isoler l’un de l’autre exige une necessite d'utiliser cette approche, ce qui rend cette etude une source precieuse. Mots cles: Organisation de cooperation de Shanghai; Republiques turques; Asie central; Economies transitionnelles

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicBelt and Road InitiativeFrench-language works237,207