MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1888508682 · doi:10.1111/aab.12033

Cytology of infection, development and expression of resistance to <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> in canola

2013· article· en· W1888508682 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhinandan Deora, B. D. Gossen, Mary Ruth McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Applied Biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsBiologyClubrootCultivarXylemPericycleInoculationEndodermisBotanyCanolaBrassicaHorticultureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The timing and expression of resistance to four isolates of Plasmodiophora brassicae, collected from research sites where pathotypes 2, 3, 5 and 6 (Williams' system) had been dominant when characterised in 2006, were assessed in four new commercial cultivars of canola (Brassica napus) with resistance to clubroot. Each of the resistant cultivars was highly resistant to all four of the isolates, and there was no difference in their response to infection. Root hair infection occurred at high levels, but pathogen development occurred more slowly than in a susceptible cultivar (control). Secondary infection and development in cortical cells was severely inhibited in each of the resistant cultivars; only a few bi‐nucleated plasmodia were observed at 12 days after inoculation (DAI), and plasmodia were rarely observed at 18 and 24 DAI. In contrast, development in the susceptible cultivar had progressed to resting spores by 24 DAI. A dense ring of accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) was observed in the endodermis, pericycle and vascular cambium of non‐inoculated controls and inoculated plants of the resistant cultivars. However, the ROS ring disappeared rapidly in infected plants of the susceptible cultivar. Plasmodia invaded the stele of susceptible roots by preferentially colonising the xylem parenchyma cells. Expansion and enlargement of lignified xylem cells was observed by 35 DAI. The absence of any specific points of ROS accumulation or lignification of epidermal or cortical cells in the resistant cultivars indicates that a hypersensitive response is not the main mechanism of resistance in these lines. The uniform response of these resistant cultivars to the four isolates of P. brassicae indicates that the resistance in each cultivar may be conditioned by a gene(s) from a single source that confers broad resistance, because most sources of resistance to P. brassicae are pathotype specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Applied BiologySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207