MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria and carbohydrate blood group evolution

2010· article· en· W1888908820 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Cserti‐Gazdewich

Bibliographic record

VenueISBT Science Series · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmodium falciparumBiologyMalariaRed blood cellVirologyPlasmodium (life cycle)ImmunologyCell biologyParasite hosting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmodium falciparum malaria, as ancient as hominid evolution itself, has provoked more change within the human genome than any other pathogen. JBS Haldane observed the overlapping distributions for thalassaemia and malaria endemicity and proposed ‘balanced polymorphisms’ as advantageous heterozygous mutant states. We now appreciate the wider range of haemoglobinopathies, membranopathies, and enzymopathies as distinct evolutionary adjustments to the erythrocyte, the very compartment which P. falciparum hijacks to sicken the host. Unlike other Plasmodium species, P. falciparum ’s power over the erythrocyte consists of its limitless red cell infectivity and its capacity to render the infected red blood cell (iRBC) adhesive enough to arrest in the circulation. This latter cytoadhesivity is achieved by sticky knob proteins known as ‘ Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein‐1’ (PfEMP‐1), trafficked to the red cell exterior from the parasite within. PfEMP‐1 is designed to latch onto endothelial cells of the post‐capillary venules (‘sequestration’), as well as onto other uninfected red blood cells and platelets (‘rosetting’). In so stalling their flow towards the spleen, the iRBC doubly harms the host by resisting the first defence of reticuloendothelial clearance and congesting the host’s microvasculature. The youngest, most malaria‐naïve suffer malaria’s highest case fatality rates, revealing just how critical this innate (pre‐adaptive) immune control of parasitaemia is. The biochemical means by which PfEMP‐1 achieves its cytoadhesive promiscuity is in part through one particular lectin‐like domain, DBL1α. This domain binds not only to heparan sulphate‐like glycosaminoglycans, but to two blood group antigens expressed densely on erythrocytes: the group A carbohydrate in the ABO system and antigens (including those of the Knops system) on CR1 (CD35). If indeed these ligands are critical in the molecular pathogenesis of malaria fatalities, then we might expect to observe non‐adhesive variants ascending to higher prevalence in the most malaria‐endemic parts of the world. The cytoadhesivity of wildtype group A hosts is theoretically, and in vitro , demonstrably mitigated by what we now know are the mutant phenotypes which define the polymorphisms of the ABO system. These include the group O or B alleles, the weaker A types and the genetics influencing the quantity of secreted (competitive) free A antigen in group A hosts. Each of these phenotypes is observed at higher frequencies in malaria‐endemic areas. Certain CR1 polymorphisms are also more frequently found in these parts of the world. The assembly of in vitro , geographic and clinical evidence weighs heavily towards ABO evolution being a highly specific response to P. falciparum. Rather than bypassing invasion or enhancing clearance, these mutations are special because they highlight the importance of escape from cytoadhesion. Forthcoming are the results of the first prospective study powered to confirm the impact of ABO on malaria mortality (NCT 00707200, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). Should the results of emerging studies confirm a survival advantage among group O individuals, the basic strategy for transfusion support in malaria may shift to greater use of group O red cells. The clinical value of this approach, more immediately available than any new drug or vaccine development, will need to be tested in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISBT Science SeriesSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207