Efficient design of oversampled NPR GDFT filter banks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a flexible, efficient design technique for the prototype filter of an oversampled near perfect reconstruction (NPR) generalized discrete Fourier transform (GDFT) filter bank. Such filter banks have several desirable properties for subband processing systems that are sensitive to aliasing; e.g., subband adaptive filters. Our design criteria for the prototype filter are explicit bounds on the aliased components in the subbands, the aliased components in the output, and the distortion induced by the filter bank. It is shown that the design of an optimal prototype filter can be transformed into a convex optimization problem that can be efficiently solved. Our design technique provides an efficient and effective tool for exploring many of the inherent trade-offs in the design of the prototype filter, including the trade-off between aliasing in the subbands and the distortion induced by the filter bank. In our examples we calculate several of these trade-offs and demonstrate that our method can generate filters with significantly better performance than filters obtained using current design methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".