MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1889470490

DE/REconstructing my Athlete-Student-Teacher Self: A Critical Autoethnography of Resistance in Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE)

2012· article· en· W1889470490 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erin Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoethnographyNarrativeTeacher educationPedagogySociologyPhysical educationNarrative inquiryMeaning (existential)Resistance (ecology)ReflexivityHumanitiesPsychologyGender studiesArtLiteratureSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

0 0 1 295 1683 University of Manitoba 14 3 1975 14.0 96 800x600 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Through a yearlong critical autoethnographic study, I explore key moments, shifting perspectives, and pivotal transitions that have impacted my journey as a critical scholar in the field of physical education teacher education (PETE). I draw upon my experiences as an athlete, student, and now teacher in a PETE program in an attempt to answer the question: What informs and continues to inform the athlete-student-teacher I am? By sharing my story, I hope to promote reflexive first-person narrative in order to support alternative approaches to knowing ourselves as PETE practitioners and feed a growing need for “re-searching” ways forward in the field of physical education (PE). It is my hope that meaning will emerge from my story in such a way that teachers and students alike are stimulated to reflect upon how their experiences inform their PE pedagogy and practices. Dans le cadre d’une etude auto-ethnographique critique d’une duree d’un an, j’ai explore les moments cles, les perspectives changeantes et les transitions cruciales qui ont influence mon cheminement de chercheur critique en formation des enseignants d’education physique. J’ai puise dans mes experiences comme athlete, etudiant et, maintenant, comme formatrice en enseignement  en education physique pour repondre a la question suivante : « Qu’est-ce qui a motive et qui motive toujours l’athlete, l’etudiant et l’enseignant en moi? » En relatant mon histoire, j’aimerais lancer une autoreflexion narrative et favoriser le recours a d’autres approches utiles pour apprendre a mieux nous connaitre comme formateurs d’enseignants en education physique.  J’aimerais aussi propulser vers l’avant la  « re-cherche » dans le domaine de l’education physique. J’ose croire que mon recit sera assez percutant pour inspirer les enseignants et les etudiants en education physique a reflechir aux facons dont leurs experiences personnelles influencent leurs approches pedagogiques et leurs pratiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207