Responsibilities of the non-state actor in armed conflict and the market place : theoretical considerations and empirical findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. NOEMI GAL-OR, MATH NOORTMANN, & CEDRIC RYNGAERT - Introduction A View from the Trenches 2. GEOFFREY HARRIS - The Rise of Non-State Actors: A Supranational Institutional Perspective Part I: Conceptualizing the Responsibility of the NSA in International Law 3. BARBARA WOODWARD - Non-State Actor Responsibilities: Obligations, Monitoring & Compliance 4. WOUTER VANDENHOLE - Shared Responsibility of Non-State Actors: a Human Rights Perspective 5. JOANNA KYRIAKAKIS -Multinational Corporations, Legal Personality and International Crimes 6. JORDAN J. PAUST - Responsibilities of Armed Opposition Groups and Corporations for Violations of International Law and Possible Sanctions Part II. International Responsibility of Corporations 7. ROBIN F. HANSEN - MNEs as Enterprises in International Law 8. ANNE VAN AAKEN - Markets as an Accountability Mechanism in International Law 9. PAULINE COLLINS - International Corporate Criminal Liability for Private Military and Security Companies - A Possibility? 10. DAI TAMADA - Investors' Responsibility towards Host States? Regulation of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration 11. MANUEL DE ALMEIDA Ribeiro - Responsibility of Private Entities in International Environmental Law: Transport of Oil by Sea and Nuclear Energy Production 12. SARA SECK & ANNA DOLIDZE - ITLOS Case No. 17 and the Evolving Principles for Corporate Responsibility under International Law Part III. International responsibility of Armed Opposition Groups 13. VERONIKA BILKOVA - Establishing Direct Responsibility of Armed Opposition Groups for Violations of International Humanitarian Law? 14. STEN VERHOEVEN - International Responsibility of Armed Opposition: GROUPS Lessons from State Responsibility for Actions of Armed Opposition Groups 15. ANNYSSA BELLAL - Establishing the Direct Responsibility of Non-State Armed Groups for Violations of International Norms: Issues of Attribution 16. LUKE MOFFETT Beyond Attribution: Responsibility of Armed Non-State Actors for Reparations in Northern Ireland, Colombia and Uganda 17. FRANCIS ABIEW & NOEMI GAL-OR - International Responsibility of the AOG in International Law: Is there a Case for an African Approach? Conclusion 18. NOEMI GAL-OR, MATH NOORTMANN, & CEDRIC RYNGAERT - Can the AOG and MNC Be Liable in International Law?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".