MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular characterization of a <i>Stagonospora nodorum</i> lipase gene <i>LIP1</i>

2011· article· en· W1890054437 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Feng, R. Hwang, Sheau‐Fang Hwang, D. A. Gaudet, Stephen E. Strelkov

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Pathology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAgriculture Food and Rural Development
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsLipaseBiologyGeneGlumeAdhesionRecombinant DNABiochemistryBotanyEnzymeChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A triglyceride lipase gene ( LIP1 ) was cloned from Stagonospora nodorum , the causal agent of wheat glume blotch. LIP1 encodes a 561 amino acid preproprotein with a predicted N ‐terminal signal peptide. Its expression was up‐regulated during plant infection and in culture media supplemented with saturated fatty glycerides. The recombinant Lip1 protein possessed lipolytic activity against a broad range of lipid substrates. When applied to wheat leaves, recombinant Lip1 decreased the hydrophobicity of the leaf surface, probably by liquefaction of epicuticular wax. Pretreatment of wheat leaves with Lip1 decreased the rate of conidial adhesion from 69·5% to 22·7% and from 58·9% to 28·4% in two independent assays based on different protocols. LIP1 replacement strains showed decreased lipolytic activity on culture media relative to the wild‐type strain, and adhesion of the conidia to the wheat leaf surface was impaired in the gene replacement strains. In two experiments, adhesion rates were 54·3% and 41·6% in the LIP1 replacement strains, as opposed to 77·7% and 66·6%, respectively, in the wild‐type. Collectively, the data demonstrate that the secreted lipase Lip1 is important for the adhesion of S. nodorum infection to wheat leaves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant PathologySame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207