Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meme si l'ecart entre le francais familier et le francais standard devient de plus en plus grand, nous continuons a enseigner exclusivement le francais standard dans la classe orientee vers l'approche communicative. Donc, pour exposer la necessite d'enseigner le francais familier officiellement dans la classe, nous essayons de presenter et d'analyser un phenomene morpho-phonologique particulier au francais familier : la chute du /l/. Nous remarquons, dans le francais parle en France et au Canada, une forte tendance a la chute du phoneme /l/ dans les pronoms clitiques et les articles. Pour ce faire, d'abord, nous examinons les donnees obtenues des etudes quantitatives precedentes. Elles demontrent que les raisons phonologiques seules ne peuvent pas expliquer la chute du /l/. La ou phonologiquement le /l/ peut tomber dans les formes grammaticales, il se maintient dans les formes lexicales. Par consequent, a grands traits, nous esquissons la distribution des occurrences selon la categorie grammaticale. Puis, nous cherchons a evaluer les interpretations de certains linguistes sur la chute du /l/. Apres avoir analyse ce phenomene, nous pouvons conclure qu'il s'explique par les facteurs phonologique, morphologique et sociolinguistique. C'est un phenomene variable selon les niveaux de langue, frequent au niveau familier, mais exceptionnel au niveau soigne. L'absence du /l/ dans les pronoms clitiques, surtout en contexte 'il(s)+C', semble etre une variante sociolinguistique stable en francais familier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".