Whole body vibration measurements of forklift truck drivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurements o f vibrations on the body o f forklifts, driven by standing operators, were conducted to assess possibility o f health hazards.The instrument used was a Larson-Davis HVM100 Digital Triaxial Vibration Meter, and the measured magnitudes were acceleration (m/s2) and Vibration Dose Value (m/s1.75).Measured values were assessed using the corresponding EU Directive.Even though, some o f the values did exceed the recommended limits, it was found that, because o f the limited use o f the trucks (an average o f 2 hr/day) the time-weighted averages were well below the action limit.Therefore it was concluded, that the measured vibrations did not constitute health hazard for the drivers.s o m m a ir e L'existence de risques pour la sant des ouvriers conduisant des chariots lvateurs fourche en position debout a t examine en mesurant les vibrations de ces machines.L'instrument utilis pour mesurer ces vibrations tait un Larson Davis HVM100 Digital Triaxial Vibration Meter.Les donnes d 'amplitude recueillies taient l 'acclration (m/s2) et le VDV (la valeur de la dose des vibrations) en m/s1.75.Les rsultats obtenus ont t compars avec les valeurs recommandes par la Directive de l'Union Europenne.Mme si certaines mesures surpassaient les limites recommandes, on a trouv que les moyennes dures vs poids taient infrieures aux limites prescrites puisque l 'utilisation des chariots est limite (une moyenne de deux heures par jour).On a conclu que les vibrations mesures ne reprsentaient aucun risque pour la sant des conducteurs de chariots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".