MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W189138613 · doi:10.1089/ars.2014.5850

Oxidative Protein Labeling with Analysis by Mass Spectrometry for the Study of Structure, Folding, and Dynamics

2014· review· en· W189138613 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Liuni, Shaolong Zhu, Derek J. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueAntioxidants and Redox Signaling · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ChemistryFolding (DSP implementation)Protein foldingOxidative phosphorylationMass spectrometryProtein structureBiophysicsBiochemistryBiologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIGNIFICANCE: Analytical approaches that can provide insights into the mechanistic processes underlying protein folding and dynamics are few since the target analytes-high-energy structural intermediates-are short lived and often difficult to distinguish from coexisting structures. Folding "intermediates" can be populated at equilibrium using weakly denaturing solvents, but it is not clear that these species are identical to those that are transiently populated during folding under "native" conditions. Oxidative labeling with mass spectrometric analysis is a powerful alternative for structural characterization of proteins and transient protein species based on solvent exposure at specific sites. RECENT ADVANCES: Oxidative labeling is increasingly used with exceedingly short (μs) labeling pulses, both to minimize the occurrence of artifactual structural changes due to the incorporation of label and to detect short-lived species. The recent introduction of facile photolytic approaches for producing reactive oxygen species is an important technological advance that will enable more widespread adoption of the technique. CRITICAL ISSUES: The most common critique of oxidative labeling data is that even with brief labeling pulses, covalent modification of the protein may cause significant artifactual structural changes. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: While the oxidative labeling with the analysis by mass spectrometry is mature enough that most basic methodological issues have been addressed, a complete systematic understanding of side chain reactivity in the context of intact proteins is an avenue for future work. Specifically, there remain issues around the impact of primary sequence and side chain interactions on the reactivity of "solvent-exposed" residues. Due to its analytical power, wide range of applications, and relative ease of implementation, oxidative labeling is an increasingly important technique in the bioanalytical toolbox.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntioxidants and Redox SignalingSame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207