Convênio UQAM-UFF-UFRGS: intercâmbio, interlocução, colaboração.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto traça um histórico do convênio entre a Universidade Federal Flumi- nense (UFF), a Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e a Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), destacando as produções científicas tais como congressos e publicações, resultados concretos desta interlocução de pesquisadores dos dois países.Palavras-chave: intercâmbio Brasil-Quebec; convênio; congressos e publicaçõesAbstract: This text draws the history of the Exchange Program between the Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), underlining the scientific productions such as the conferences and the publications, which are the outcome of the exchanges of researchers of the two countries.Keywords: exchange program Brazil-Quebec; conferences and publications.Résumé: Ce texte retrace l’histoire de l’accord d’échange entre l’Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), l’Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) et l’Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), tout en faisant une mise au point des productions scientifiques comme les congrès et les publications qui découlèrent de cette interlocution de chercheurs des deux pays.Mots-clés: accord d’échange Brésil-Québec; congrès et publications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it