Once Upon A Time In America de Sergio Leone, un hommage à l'œuvre culte A Clockwork Orangede Stanley Kubrick
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Once Upon a Time in America (1984) by Sergio Leone registers in part as a celebration of Stanley Kubrick’s cult classic, A Clockwork Orange(1971). Indeed, the baby-switching sequence in the nursery, ‘‘Chief’s bouncing baby’’, is more than a mere nod to Kubrick : it is a useful point of entry for analysing elements the two films have in common, particularly their music. This article examines the effect achieved when a celebration of cult is incorporated into production of another work, and thereby allows for an examination of questions of authority, especially as they relate to the individuality of the auteur. Resume: Once Upon a Time in America (1984) de Sergio Leone s’inscrit en partie comme une celebration cultiste du film A Clockwork Orange(1971) de Stanley Kubrick. En effet, la sequence de l’echange des bebes a la pouponniere, ‘Chief’s bouncing baby’, depasse le simple clin d’œil a Kubrick : voila une piste pour analyser nombre d’elements communs aux deux œuvres, particulierement la musique. Le point de vue adopte montre l’effet produit quand une celebration du culte passe par la production d’une œuvre, cela permet d’aborder la question de l’autorite, de la singularite de l’auteur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it