Pent-up World of Chrysanthemums： Analysis of John Steinbeck’s Chrysanthemums
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chrysanthemums is a masterpiece taken from John Steinbeck’s short-story-collection The Long Valley. The story mainly tells the married Elisa Allen’s pursuit of one integrated self but somehow fails finally. This paper intends to interpret Elisa Allen’s pursuit process from the perspective of Freud’s psychoanalysis, and try to dig out the causes of her final failure. Keywords: chrysanthemum, pent-up, psychoanalysis Resume Chrysantheme,une nouvelle excellente, fait partie du recueil de nouvelles The Long Valley de John Steinbeck. La nouvelle raconte principalement l’aneantissement du reve d’une femme mariee Elisa Allen qui poursuit l’integralite de soi. Cet article essaie d’interpreter le processus complet de poursuite d’Elisa Allen dans la perspective de l’analyse psychologique de Freud, et de trouver la raison de son echec final. Mots cles: chysantheme, ferme, l’analyse psychologique 摘 要 約翰•斯坦貝克的《菊花》是其 “The Long Valley”中的一篇精彩短篇小說。小說主要講述了已婚的伊莉莎•愛倫追求 “完整自我 ”的夢想的破碎。本文試從佛洛德的精神分析批評的角度解讀伊莉莎的自我追求全過程, 並探尋其最後夢想破碎的原因。 關鍵詞：菊花；幽閉；精神分析
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".