MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1893840820 · doi:10.1177/1352458515586086

Progressive multiple sclerosis exhibits decreasing glutamate and glutamine over two years

2015· article· en· W1893840820 on OpenAlexafffund
EL MacMillan, Roger Tam, Yinshan Zhao, IM Vavasour, Dkb Li, Joël Oger, M. S. Freedman, SH Kolind, AL Traboulsee

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsGlutamineGlutamate receptorCreatineMultiple sclerosisMedicineInternal medicineAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisCholineBiomarkerConfidence intervalEndocrinologyGastroenterologyBiologyBiochemistryDiseaseImmunologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Few biomarkers of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) are sensitive to change within the two-year time frame of a clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarkers of MS disease progression with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in secondary progressive MS (SPMS). METHODS: Forty-seven SPMS subjects were scanned at baseline and annually for two years. Concentrations of N-acetylaspartate, total creatine, total choline, myo-inositol, glutamate, glutamine, and the sum glutamate+glutamine were measured in a single white matter voxel. RESULTS: Glutamate and glutamine were the only metabolites to show an effect with time: with annual declines of (95% confidence interval): glutamate -4.2% (-6.2% to -2.2%, p < 10(-4)), glutamine -7.3% (-11.8% to -2.9%, p = 0.003), and glutamate+glutamine -5.2% (-7.6% to -2.8%, p < 10(-4)). Metabolite rates of change were more apparent than changes in clinical scores or brain atrophy measures. CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of change of both glutamate and glutamine over two years suggest they are promising new biomarkers of MS disease progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis JournalSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207