MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1894080886

Donald Stuart Richan, 1943-2004

2004· article· en· W1894080886 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Paul Banfield, Ian Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityStrong
KeywordsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Donald Stuart Richan, who was a well known member of the archival community in Canada, passed away on 22 February 2004, after a very brief but devastating struggle with cancer.Born in Winnipeg, Don grew up on the prairies, living in both Winnipeg and Moose Jaw.From the beginning, he was an outdoor enthusiast, but it was his early love of history and literature that motivated his career.He received his BA from the University of Saskatchewan in 1978, and completed his MA at the University of Regina in 1981.He then moved to Ontario to begin work on his Ph.D. in History, at the University of Toronto.The career of an archivist can be summarized in a good, sound archival chronology punctuated by the milestones that divide his fonds into its series and sub-series.From 1985-1989, he was the first Archivist of the City of Regina, working in the Saskatchewan Archives Board (SAB).From 1989-1991, he was Head of Reference Services at SAB.While there, he demonstrated excellent project management skills, overseeing a move of 35,000 boxes to temporary off-site storage and then their return, with nothing misplaced in the process.In 1991 he became Director, Historical Records, at the Saskatchewan Archives, and in 1994, he was appointed University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivariaSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207