Turning Macro-appraisal Decisions into Archival Holdings: Crafting Function-based Terms and Conditions for the Transfer of Archival Records
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis que les Archives nationales du Canada (dornavant Bibliothque et Archives Canada) ont introduit la pratique de la macro-valuation en 1990, leurs archivistes responsables des documents gouvernementaux ont tent d'tablir des conditions et des modalits de transfert pour les documents d'archives en tenant compte de l'analyse fonctionnelle.En 2003, le groupe de travail des modalits de transfert (GTMT) des AN/BAC a fait le lien entre l'valuation et l'acquisition en laborant la mthodologie ncessaire pour assurer que les dcisions de l'archiviste dcoulant de la macro-valuation se traduisent en une documentation pour disposer des documents (les conditions et les modalits pour le transfert de documents archivistiques dans l'autorisation de disposer des documents, ainsi que le guide d'application complmentaire).Ces outils permettent aux archivistes d'assurer l'identification et la slection de documents d'archives dans tous les mdias.Cet article situe le travail du GTMT dans le contexte de l'volution de la gestion des documents du gouvernement fdral et de la mthodologie de la macro-valuation telle qu'elle est employe BAC, puis il prsente un survol de la documentation produite par le GTMT pour disposer des documents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".