The Comparative Analysis of the Nouns Indicating a Person in Chinese and English Neologisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neologisms are the words that appeared most recently in the process of the society development. They are not only a new phenomenon of the language itself, they also best reflect the changes in the society. With help of the semantic field theory, the author has carried out a comparative analysis of the meaning of nouns indicating a person in the two languages, has found out that the society background of the two languages, the lifestyles of the speakers, the focuses of attention have something in common, however, the differences are more numerous. Besides, through the structural analysis of the nouns indicating a person, we have analyzed the word-formation of Chinese and English words, the similarities and differences of the elements of compounds, the changes in the number of roots etc. Key words: neologisms; nouns indicating a person; semantic field; meaning; structure Resume: Les Neologismes sont les mots qui apparaissent le plus recemment dans le processus du developpement social. Ils ne sont pas seulement un phenomene nouveau de la langue meme, mais aussi les meilleurs reflets des changements dans la societe. Avec l'aide de la theorie des champs semantiques, l'auteur a effectue une analyse comparative de la signification des noms indiquants une personne dans les deux langues et il a decouvert que l’environnement social de ces deux langues, les modes de vie des locuteurs et les centres d’attention ont quelques choses en commun, toutefois, les differences sont plus nombreuses. En outre, par le biais de l'analyse structurelle des noms indiquants une personne, nous avons analyse la formation des mots en chinois et en anglais, les similitudes et les differences des elements de composes, les changements dans le nombre de racines etc Mots-cles: les neologismes, des noms indiquants une personne; les champs semantiques; le sens; la structure 摘 要：新詞語即社會發展過程中最新產生的詞語，它們不僅是語言本身的新現象，同時最能反映社會的發展變 化。本文運用語義場理論，對兩種語言中的指人名詞的意義進行了比較研究，發現兩種語言各自的社會背景、語言使用者的生活方式，關注的重點既有相同性但更多是差異性。另外通過對指人名詞的結構分析，研究了漢語和英語的構詞方式，複合詞成分的異同及詞根數量的變化等。 關鍵詞：新詞；指人名詞；語義場；意義；結構
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".