MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1895121002 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/18

<i>β</i>PICTORIS’ INNER DISK IN POLARIZED LIGHT AND NEW ORBITAL PARAMETERS FOR<i>β</i>PICTORIS<i>b</i>

2015· article· he· W1895121002 on OpenAlexaff
Maxwell A. Millar‐Blanchaer, James R. Graham, Laurent Pueyo, Paul Kalas, Rebekah I. Dawson, Jason Wang, Marshall D. Perrin, Dae‐Sik Moon, Bruce Macintosh, S. Mark Ammons, Travis Barman, Andrew Cardwell, Christine Chen, Eugene Chiang, Jeffrey Chilcote, Tara Cotten, Robert J. De Rosa, Zachary H. Draper, Jennifer Dunn, Gaspard Duchêne, Thomas M. Esposito, Michael P. Fitzgerald, Katherine B. Follette, Stephen J. Goodsell, Alexandra Z. Greenbaum, Markus Hartung, Pascale Hibon, Sasha Hinkley, Patrick Ingraham, Rebecca Jensen-Clem, Quinn Konopacky, James E. Larkin, Douglas Long, Jérôme Maîre, Franck Marchis, Mark S. Marley, Christian Marois, Katie M. Morzinski, E. Nielsen, David W. Palmer, Rebecca Oppenheimer, Lisa Poyneer, Abhijith Rajan, Fredrik T. Rantakyrö, Jean-Baptiste Ruffio, Naru Sadakuni, Leslie Saddlemyer, Adam C. Schneider, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, Rémi Soummer, Sandrine Thomas, Gautam Vasisht, David Vega, J. Kent Wallace, Kimberly Ward-Duong, Sloane Wiktorowicz, Schuyler Wolff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDebris diskPosition angleAstrophysicsRADIUSOrbital inclinationPlanetOrbital eccentricityEccentricity (behavior)ExoplanetScale heightThick diskPlanetary systemHaloBinary numberGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present H -band observations of β Pic with the Gemini Planet Imager's (GPI's) polarimetry mode that reveal the debris disk between ∼0 3 (6 AU) and ∼1 7 (33 AU), while simultaneously detecting β Pic b . The polarized disk image was fit with a dust density model combined with a Henyey–Greenstein scattering phase function. The best-fit model indicates a disk inclined to the line of sight ( ) with a position angle (PA) (slightly offset from the main outer disk, ), that extends from an inner disk radius of to well outside GPI's field of view. In addition, we present an updated orbit for β Pic b based on new astrometric measurements taken in GPI's spectroscopic mode spanning 14 months. The planet has a semimajor axis of , with an eccentricity The PA of the ascending node is offset from both the outer main disk and the inner disk seen in the GPI image. The orbital fit constrains the stellar mass of β Pic to Dynamical sculpting by β Pic b cannot easily account for the following three aspects of the inferred disk properties: (1) the modeled inner radius of the disk is farther out than expected if caused by β Pic b ; (2) the mutual inclination of the inner disk and β Pic b is when it is expected to be closer to zero; and (3) the aspect ratio of the disk ( ) is larger than expected from interactions with β Pic b or self-stirring by the disk's parent bodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207