Lung mechanics in individuals with spinal cord injury: effects of injury level and posture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) exhibit reduced lung volumes and flow rates as a result of respiratory muscle weakness. These features have not, however, been investigated in relation to the combined effects of injury level and posture. Changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), FEV(1)/FVC, forced expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity (FEF(50)), inspiratory capacity (IC), and expiratory reserve volume (ERV) were assessed by injury level in the seated and supine positions in 74 individuals with SCI. The main findings were 1) FVC, FEV(1), and IC increased with descending SCI level down to T(10), below which they tended to level off; 2) supine values of FVC and FEV(1) tended to be larger in the supine compared with the seated posture down to injury level T(1), caudad to which they were less than when seated; 3) IC increased proportionately more down to injury level L(1), below which it declined slightly and plateaued; 4) ERV was measurable even at high cervical injuries, was generally smaller in the supine position, reached peak values in both positions at T(10) injury level, and then rapidly declined at lower levels; 5) when subjects were separated according to current, former, and never smokers, only formerly smoking paraplegic individuals demonstrated spirometric values significantly less than paraplegic individuals who never smoked. Changes in spirometric measurements in SCI are dependent on injury level and posture. These findings support the concept that the increase in vital capacity in supine position is related to the effect of gravity on abdominal contents and increase in IC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it