MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1896075806 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2011.02.0007

Genetic Diversity of 30 Cai-xins (<em>Brassica rapa var. parachinensis</em>) Evaluated Based on AFLP Molecular Data

2011· article· en· W1896075806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrassica rapaBiologyAmplified fragment length polymorphismBrassicaGenetic diversityBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cai-xin is common Chinese name for Brassica rapa var. parachinensis that is one of very important leafage vegetables in South China. The objectives of this research were to detect genetic diversities of the selected 30 Cai-xins based on AFLP makers as well as to evaluate the feasibilities of AFLP approach for biodiverse study . In this paper, the 25 pairs of AFLP primers were employed to generate 1160 amplified bands, of which 876 bands account for 76% were polymorphic bands The average polymorphism of tested 25 primer combinations reached 80%,  the mean of polymorphism information content (PIC) was about 0.0239 and the amount of polymorphic loci was about 85.33%. The parameters of genetic diversity were calculated by the aid of GenAlEx 6.4 software including the number of different alleles (Na) 1.754, the number of effective alleles (Ne) 1.544, Shannon's Information Index (I) 0.472 and He 0.363. The values of genetic distance (GD) and genetic similarity (GS) were 0.112 and 0.895, respectively. Statistic analysis revealed that almost 100 percentage of variation existed within Cai-xins based on AMOVA data. The tested Caixins can classified into four groups at the 0.17 threshold of Nei’s genetic distances by clustering analysis based on UPGMA approach . The present results indicated that the genetic diversity of the tested Cai-xins should be quite low and the genetic variations of Caixins be mostly attributed to within varieties. Whereas we confidentially have conclusions that AFLP approach might be useful, efficiency and accuracy to detect genetic diversity among varieties, landraces and lines of Caixin, especially for those which have close relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it