MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effects of productivity and seasonality on life history: comparing age at maturity among moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) populations

2002· article· en· W1896724858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Steven H. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityBiologySeasonalityEcologyIntraspecific competitionJuvenileRange (aeronautics)Maturity (psychological)Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The productivity hypothesis in respect of an animal species’ geographical range predicts that whereas higher productivity at the equatorial periphery of a species’ range favours superior competitors, lower productivity at the centre of a species’ range favours high reproduction and reduced competitive traits. I test whether life‐history patterns follow this hypothesis, using demographic data from 15 Canadian moose (Alces alces) populations. Two models are contrasted; the first assumes that intraspecific variation in age at maturity is explained proximately by density and juvenile mortality. Age at maturity was found to increase with decreasing juvenile mortality (P = 0.01) and increasing density (P = 0.006). To test the productivity hypothesis, the second model additionally included primary productivity and seasonality as geographical explanatory variables that would ultimately influence age at maturity via juvenile mortality and density. Path analysis indicated that including productivity and seasonality improved the model predictions of variation in age at maturity (Ra20.56 and 0.85). In bivariate comparisons, seasonality was negatively associated (P = 0.01) with age at maturity. In the best model, however, primary productivity was the environmental variable that explained 25% of the variance in age at maturity, and forest cover replaced seasonality as an explanatory variable. The positive association between primary productivity and age at maturity is consistent with the productivity hypothesis. Relative to populations that lived at the centre of the species’ range (51°N), moose populations living in relatively high productivity and low seasonality environments (equatorial periphery of species’ range; 48°N) experienced less juvenile mortality, more variable year‐to‐year density, higher relative density and slower life history (slower growth rate, later age at maturity, lower fecundity).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and BiogeographySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207