Las manchas del jaguar, de Clinton Ramírez: El penosos trabajo de la memoria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: El propósito de este trabajo es demostrar cómo Las manchas del Jaguar (1987,2005), responde a un deliberado deseo por parte del autor de rescatar una existencia colectiva mediante la escritura. Clinton Ramírez muestra en su primera novela un excelente control de adecuados mecanismos narrativos que le permiten crear ene le texto una reveladora polifonía, consecuencia de la memoria colectiva, que ante la impactante presencia de la muerte rescata fragmentos dispersos de una vida ya pasada. El mecanismo poético sirve a la realidad ficticia para asegurar las coordenadas socio-culturales de un pueblo y sus habitantes, insertándolos formalmente en el discurso mayor de la historia. También le sirve al autor para exorcizar ciertos fantasmas personales de los que intenta liberarse. Descriptores: Novela contemporánea del Caribe colombiano; Zona Bananera de Santa Marta; memoria, escritura, exorcismo. Abstract: The purpose of this study is to show how Las manchas del Jaguar (1987.2005), responds to its author's deliberate desire to rescue a collective existence through writing. Clinton Ramírez (Ciénaga, Magdalena, 1962) demonstrates in his first novel an excellent control of adequate narrative mechanisms which allow for the creation of a revealing polyphony within the text, resulting from a collective memory that in the presence of death recovers dispersed fragments of a life that has already paseed. The poetic mechanism used by this work of fiction ensures the soio-cultural coordinates of a town and its peoples, formally inserting them in the greater discourse of history. It also enables the author to free himself from some personal demons. Key words: Contemporany Novel in the Colombian Caribbean; Zona Bannaera os Santa Marta;memory, Writing, Exorcissm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".