Lung Nodule Classification Using Deep Features in CT Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early detection of lung cancer can help in a sharp decrease in the lung cancer mortality rate, which accounts for more than 17% percent of the total cancer related deaths. A large number of cases are encountered by radiologists on a daily basis for initial diagnosis. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems can assist radiologists by offering a "second opinion" and making the whole process faster. We propose a CAD system which uses deep features extracted from an auto encoder to classify lung nodules as either malignant or benign. We use 4303 instances containing 4323 nodules from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) dataset to obtain an overall accuracy of 75.01% with a sensitivity of 83.35% and false positive of 0.39/patient over a 10 fold cross validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it