MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1898441837

Means of survival: youth unemployment and entrepreneurial training in Newfoundland

2003· dissertation· en· W1898441837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tina Sheppard

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipUnemploymentPromotion (chess)Government (linguistics)NewspaperGeneral partnershipYouth unemploymentPublic relationsPolitical scienceEconomic growthBusinessAdvertisingEconomicsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federal and provincial governments first began tracking youth unemployment rates in the 1970s. Since then, the youth unemployment rate has remained in the double- digits both nationally and in Newfoundland. The Federal Government has responded to the problem of youth unemployment in various ways since the late 1960s, most recently in partnership with business interests to promote entrepreneurship as an alternative to traditional paid employment. Because youth generally lack the experience and financing required to open a business, they seem unlikely targets for these messages. This thesis set out to discover what else the promotion of entrepreneurship as a solution to unemployment might be trying to achieve. -- This thesis approaches the promotion of entrepreneurship as part of a government and business sponsored social movement that is in place to promote New Right values. It uses primary documents and newspaper articles to lay out the development of an entrepreneurial movement in Newfoundland. It also explores how and why individuals and organisations become involved in entrepreneurial training, their attitudes towards unemployment and entrepreneurship, and their experiences with these, through the use of semi-structured interviews with participants, instructors and administrators of two youth entrepreneurial training programmes that ran consecutively in two Newfoundland cities. -- The promotion of entrepreneurship is different from past government responses to youth unemployment in that it is in partnership with business interests, and appears everywhere - in newspapers, job sites, television, magazines, radio, and school classrooms. In addition, sponsorship money is available for organisations that want to run entrepreneurial training programmes, and for unemployed individuals who want to learn the skills. The participants in this thesis believe that individual employment circumstances are an individual responsibility, but they also believe that social policies very much shape available choices. All participants in this research used entrepreneurial training as a means of staying in Newfoundland when employment opportunities proved insufficient. For most participants in this research, entrepreneurial training was a source of income and occupation at a time when there were no other employment options available to them. It was simply a means of survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207