MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1898622124 · doi:10.1002/ppul.22868

Pediatric long-term home mechanical ventilation: Twenty years of follow-up from one Canadian center

2013· article· en· W1898622124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Pulmonology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeMechanical ventilationVentilation (architecture)PediatricsRetrospective cohort studyEmergency medicineSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Canadian longitudinal data from a pediatric domiciliary long-term mechanical ventilation (LTMV) program is lacking. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to report on the clinical characteristics and trends of children followed in one of Canada's pediatric home ventilation programs over the past 20 years. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients receiving long-term domociliary mechanical ventilation between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 2011 in a single center. Domiciliary long-term mechanical ventilation was defined as the daily use of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NiPPV) for at least 3 months, in the users' home or in a long-term residential facility. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2011, a total of 379 children were identified (313 [83%] with noninvasive ventilation). The median age at initiation was 9.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.9-13.9), the median duration of ventilation was 2.2 years (IQR 0.8-4.9) and 53% were male. Ninety-nine percent of children were cared for at home. The reason for ventilation was "musculoskeletal" in origin for the majority of children. The number of children receiving long-term mechanical ventilation at home increased from 2 in 1991 to 156 children as of December 2011. There was a twofold increase in the number of invasive ventilation initiations in the second 10 years, n = 45 (2001-2011) as compared to the first 10 years, n = 21 (1991-2000). However, there was more than a fivefold increase in the number of noninvasive initiations in the first 10 years, n = 50 (1991-2000) as compared to the second 10 years, n = 263 (2001-2011). The largest growth was in the 13-18 years age group. There were 55 (15%) mortalities over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our 20-year retrospective study has shown that there has been an exponential growth in the number of children receiving domiciliary LTMV with the majority of children having favorable outcomes. Our study represents a step towards developing a Canadian registry to design and implement programmatic change for this medically complex population to ensure best practice for these children as well as their families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it