Production of Heymann nephritis by a chemically modified renal antigen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An autoimmune kidney disease morphologically and functionally similar to Heymann nephritis (HN) was induced in mature male Sprague Dawley rats by repeated weekly IP injections of a chemically modified azo sonicated ultracentrifuged (u/c) rat kidney fraction 3 (rKF3) antigen in an aqueous medium. The experiment was terminated 15 weeks after the first injection of the chemically altered antigen. Serum samples collected and analysed by an indirect fluorescent antibody test on normal rat kidney sections during the course of the experiment showed a gradual rise in circulating pathogenic autoantibodies directed against the proximal tubular brush border regions. Proteinuria was present and significantly increased in the urine of two of eight rats. The arising immune-complex glomerulonephritis (ICGN) revealed typical HN kidney disease lesions in 70% of the rats in histological, direct fluorescent antibody and electron-microscopical examinations. Control rats injected similarly with the an unmodified version of the same antigen did not develop the HN-characteristic morphological and functional changes. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the autoimmune kidney disease designated as an active HN has been produced by the administration of a chemically altered renal antigen in an aqueous solution and not by the usual presentation of the nephritogenic renal antigen in an adjuvant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".