MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1899493649 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2005.1639828

LEO-15 Observatory - the next generation

2005· article· en· W1899493649 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Creed, Scott Glenn, Oscar Schofield, H. Barrier, Rosemarie F. Petrecca, J.A. Dobarro, Sean E. McLean, Andrew H. Barnard, Kevin M. Brown, Russell Adams, S. Feener

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsAtlantic School of Theology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpgradeSoftware deploymentObservatoryTelecommunicationsEthernetComputer sciencePort (circuit theory)SoftwareGigabitShoreEngineeringPlug-inElectrical engineeringComputer networkOperating systemOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cabled LEO-15 observatory was a vision of Fred Grassle and Chris von Alt that became a reality in 1996 with the deployment of Nodes A and B in 15 meters of water off of Tuckerton, New Jersey. These nodes have served the scientific community well for almost a decade providing power to a variety of sensors and bi-directional real-time communication between the sensors and the PIs computer located on shore. However, technology and scientific needs have changed since these nodes were deployed making it necessary to upgrade the nodes to meet not only today's demands but also to provide expandability and flexibility for the future. The nodes must be able to do more than provide real-time data. They need to be a part of a sustained and interactive network of autonomous and remote platforms that coordinate sampling in space as well as in time. Rutgers University Mid-Atlantic Bight National Undersea Research Center (MABNURC) has partnered with WETSAT, Inc. to accomplish the LEO upgrade and expansion. The nodes will be expanded to include 10 guest ports for visiting scientists to plug their sensors into as well as ports for an auto-profiling unit, and two video ports (with lights and pan/tilt capability). There will also be expansion capabilities with two 10/100BASE-TX ports so that more guest ports can be added if necessary. Communications will be upgraded to TCP/IP over Gigabit Ethernet. Each science port will have regulated isolated power, at a software selectable voltage where necessary that is individually ground fault and over-current protected. Finally, the DACNet ocean observatory operating system software will be used to control the observatory. Phase 1 of the node upgrade, will be completed in the summer of 2005, and is concentrated on the refurbishment of Node A and installation of DACNet. In addition to the nodes, plans are underway to deploy an instrumented buoy and bottom mooring on the Endurance Line at the 60 in isobath to augment the Slocum Gliders that operate between LEO-15 and the shelf break.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207