A Survey about Professional Abilities of Old teachers of 45 and over in Junior Middle Schools under the New Curriculum Reform in China: Take Suzhou Anhui Province as an Example
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Professional abilities of teachers have been challenged by the New Curriculum Reform from 2001. To find the present state of professional abilities of old teachers of 45 and over in junior middle schools, the investigation adopts questionnaire to inquire 127 junior middle school teachers in Suzhou Anhui province. The results show that the Chinese old teachers have basic skills for teaching with good basic abilities of education and can perform their “teaching” functions well by taking advantage of teaching abilities today. But there are some problems for them in abilities of teaching reflection, education cooperation, teaching innovation, education research and career planning, which are inconsistent with the ideas of the New Curriculum Reform in China. Facing the challenges from the Reform, the old teachers must seek for the improving of professional abilities. On one hand, the government and the schools should provide good outer support for them; on the other hand, the old teachers should set up their selfdevelopment consciousness. Key words: Old teachers in junior middle schools; Professional abilities; The New Curriculum Reform in China Resume Les Capacites professionnelles des enseignants ont ete contestees par le nouveau curriculum Reformer a partir de 2001. Pour trouver l’etat actuel des capacites professionnelles des enseignants de ages de 45 ans et plus dans les colleges junior, l’enquete adopte questionnaire pour en savoir davantage, 127 enseignants des ecoles intermediaires junior a Suzhou province d’Anhui. Les resultats montrent queles enseignants de chinois anciens ont des competences de base pour l’enseignement avec de bonnes aptitudes de base des l’education et peuvent exercer leurs fonctions «apprenant» et en tirant parti dequalites pedagogiques d’aujourd’hui. Mais il ya quelques problemes pour eux dans les capacites de l’enseignement la recherche de refl exion, la cooperation l’education, l’innovation pedagogique, l’education et de carriere planifi cation, qui sont incompatibles avec les idees de la reforme du nouveau curriculum en Chine. Relever les defi s de la reforme, les anciens professeurs doivent chercher l’amelioration des capacites professionnelles. D’une part, le gouvernement et les ecolesdevraient fournir un bon support externe pour eux; d’autre part, les anciens professeurs devraientmettre en place leur auto-developpement de la conscience. Mots cles: Anciens professeurs des colleges juniors; Capacites professionnelles; La reforme du nouveau curriculum en Chine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".