MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1900158437 · doi:10.1002/zaac.200900427

Crystal Structure and Physical Properties of RbNb<sub>4</sub>Br<sub>11</sub> 

2009· article· en· W1900158437 on OpenAlex
Katja Habermehl, Holger Kleinke, Gerd Meyer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversität zu KölnDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemNiobiumCrystallographyCluster (spacecraft)Crystal structureRhombusBand gapIonMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RbNb 4 Br 11 was obtained by a solid state reaction of niobium powder, NbBr 5 and RbBr in a sealed niobium tube at 500 °C. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pmma with a = 1699.5(1), b = 726.7(1), c = 694.5(1) pm, V = 857.6(1)·10 6 pm 3 , Z = 2 and is isotypic with CsNb 4 Br 11 . Four niobium atoms build a cluster in the shape of a rhombus with bonding distances of 295 pm (Nb1–Nb2) and 304 pm (Nb2–Nb2), respectively. The structure consists of [{Nb 4 }Br 6 i Br 10/2 a–a ] – cluster complex anions that are interconnected by two common edges and two faces to the next cluster complexes, thus forming a 2D undulated layer structure. The Rb + ion is coordinated by 12 Br – ions in the shape of an anticuboctahedron. Electronic structure calculations indicate the presence of a band gap of approximately 0.33 eV. This is experimentally confirmed by an electrical conductivity measurement revealing a slightly higher gap of 0.46 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it