Neuromechanical assessment of lidocaine test block in spastic lower limbs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to quantify in spastic lower limbs the changes in reflex EMGs and in ankle stiffness after a lidocaine block of the soleus nerve to better understand physiological effects of lidocaine. Twenty patients were prospectively included and assessed before and after lidocaine block of the soleus nerve. We studied clinical and neuromechanical parameters of the triceps surae, including quantification of the maximum Hoffmann's reflex (Hmax) and tendinous reflex (T) normalized to the maximum direct motor response (Mmax), and passive ankle stiffness assessed by sinusoidal length perturbations. All patients whatever the aetiology of spasticity were improved in clinical parameters of spasticity after the block (62% reduction of the Ashworth score, 85% reduction of stretch reflex scores, increased score on the Physicians' Rating Scale). All patients presented a reduction of the Hmax-Mmax ratio (mean reduction of 67%) and the T-Mmax ratio (82%). Ankle stiffness was decreased by an average of 23%. Measured stiffness was correlated with the Ashworth score and the T-Mmax ratio. Relatively greater change in the T reflex than in the H reflex suggests that lidocaine block reduces hyperreflexia not only by interfering with generation of afferent volleys in the injected nerve, but also probably by altering generation of the volleys at the level of muscle spindles in the affected spastic muscles, presumably by blocking the transmission along gamma-efferent fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".