MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1900974434 · doi:10.1109/cits.2015.7297753

Enhanced router bypass using fine granularity transport channels

2015· article· en· W1900974434 on OpenAlexaff
Fahad A. Ghonaim, Thomas E. Darcie, Sudhakar Ganti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkRouterComputer scienceCore routerOne-armed routerGranularityNetwork packetProvisioningMultiprotocol Label SwitchingQuality of serviceDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet traffic has been growing year-after-year for decades, but processing all that traffic through traditional IP routers has become an obstacle to further expansion. Router bypass has been introduced recently to overcome capacity limitations and processing costs of IP routers. With router bypass, a portion of traffic is provisioned to bypass the traditional router and is instead switched by the transport layer. Router bypass has been shown to potentially provide a significant savings in network costs, but these advantages are limited by a reduction in statistical multiplexing associated with the subdivision of available bandwidth into typically two distinct portions. This criticism has limited interest in bypass techniques. In parallel, G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) [1] technology with its recently introduced features such as direct support for packet (i.e., Generic Framing Procedure) and the Hitless Adjustment (HAO) have paved the way for a more dynamic and finer granularity transport layer. In this paper, we explore the impact of exploiting this finer granularity of provisioned bypass bandwidth and provisioning time on the efficacy of router bypass techniques. An OMNET++ simulation show that with finer bypassing granularity throughput can be enhanced up to 13% and packet drops can be reduced by up to 30%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207