MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1902852797

117 - ATES - uma experiência participativa e dialógica de assistência técnica

2011· article· pt· W1902852797 on OpenAlexaff
Anderson Souza de Almeida, Reinaldo Adriano Brito, Hawlyson Alves de Castro, João Jair Hammes, Silva Barbosa de Souza Hammes, Lúcio da Silva Garay, Sylvana Carla Vernochi Landivar, Estevão Galhego Mari, Marcos Mariani, Danielly Moraes Moreira, Arilaine Ramona Pessoa, Cleiton Simão Zebalho

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Agroecologia · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsSociety for the Study of Architecture in Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceBusinessPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ATES e um dos projetos do PAC - Programa de Aceleracao do Crescimento, com parceria entre INCRA, Associacoes e orgao publicos e tem intuito de levar aos agricultores (as) novos conhecimentos que aumentem a producao, diminuindo a imagem negativa do que e assistencia tecnica, implantando dentro da sua realidade novas informacoes, levando em conta a experiencia do produtor (a). Ja nas capacitacoes em grupos, incentiva-se a interacao entre vizinhos. No evento macro, o contato com outros profissionais especialistas na area e facilitado. E nas Unidades Demonstrativas, toda essa informacao e aplicada na pratica, como forma de demonstrar os experimentos, para depois serem aplicados nas demais propriedades. Esse trabalho esta motivando os pequenos agricultores (as) no desenvolvimento da agroecologia como papel da agricultura familiar e no melhoramento da sua qualidade de vida, pois eles encontram nessa assessoria um novo ânimo para a busca da sua autonomia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCadernos de AgroecologiaSame topicRural Development and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207