MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An analysis on Survial Difficulties in the Visual Culture Era

2010· article· en· W1903524377 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mei Qiong-lin

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual cultureMeaning (existential)ArtHumanitiesPhilosophyVisual artsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual culture has become a reality in current culture field and transmission field. The transmission of visual culture has become a great challenge to traditional transmission. “Visual veer”and “image veer”caused by visual culture are changing people’s living circumstances : language based rational thinking gives place to vision based perceptual thinking. Image takes place of language and becomes the thinking method. This changes people’s angel of view in observing the society, and language is banished during this change. Culture imitation and culture copy supported by media technology engenders “super-reality ”. Image and reality are seperated . The “super-reality”created by visual image re-constructs reality. It is more real than reality. Reality is banished under the “super-reality”circumstances. Human body losts its existent meaning besieged by media and visual image. Space changes its intrinsic spacial difference because of the “extension of image”, which changes the field human body has been relied on. Thus human body is banished. Visual culture transmission era creates an environment in which human beings are oppressed by vision. Key Words: Visual culture, image, survival difficulties Resume La culture de la vue a deja devenu une realite dans le domaine de culture et le domaine de communication. La diffusion de la culture visuelle lance un grand defi a la diffusion de la culture traditionnelle. Cela a provoque un phenomene dit ‘‘tourner vers la vue’’ ou ‘‘tourner vers l’image’’qui a change la situation de l’existence de l’homme : la feflexion rationnelle fait place a la pensee sentimentale, l’image, remplacant la langue, devient l’outil de pensee et change l’angle sous lequel on observe la societe, au cours de ce changement la langue est deportee ; la simulation et la reproduction de la culture soutenues par la technique de media constituent la ‘‘surrealite’’, l’image se detache de la realite, le signifiant se separe du signifie, la ‘‘surrealite’’ faite de l’image visuelle reconstitue la realite , elle est bien plus reel que la realite, la realite est exilee dans la ‘‘surrealite’’ ; le corps encercle par les media et l’image visuelle pert son sens, a cause de l’extension de l’imqge, l’espace change la distance intrinseque de l’espace et le champ de l’existence du corps , le corps est donc banni. L’epoque de la diffusion de la culture visuelle produit une situation de l’existence dans laquelle l’homme est opprime par l’image. Mots-cles: la culture de la vue, l’image, la situation difficile de l’existence 摘 要 視覺文化已經成為當下文化領域和傳播領域的現實。視覺文化傳播對傳統的文化傳播構成了巨大挑戰。由此引發的“視覺轉向”或者“圖像轉向”改變了人的生存環境:依賴語言的理性思考讓位於視覺性的感性思維,圖像取代語言成為思維的工具,並改變了人類觀察社會的視角,語言在這種改變中被放逐;由媒介技術所支撐的文化的模擬和複製形成了“超真實”,形象與現實分離,能指與所指分離,視覺景象所製造的“超真實”重新構造了現實,他比真實還真,真是在“超現實”的語境中被放逐;身體在媒介與視覺形象的包圍中喪失了存在的意義,空間因“形象的延伸”而改變了固有的空間差異,改變了身體得以存在的範圍,身體被放逐。視覺文化傳播時代形成了視覺壓迫人的生存環境。 關鍵詞:視覺文化;形象;生存困境

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207