MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1903835881 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/47.11.2053

Fluorescent, Multiplexed, Automated, Primer-Extension Assay for 3120+1G→A and I148T Mutations in Cystic Fibrosis

2001· article· en· W1903835881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan H. Bernacki, Victoria M. Pratt, Timothy T. Stenzel

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorMutationPopulationBiologyCystic fibrosisMolecular biologyPoint mutationGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cystic fibrosis [(CF); Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man No. 602421] is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by chronic broncho-pulmonary disease, pancreatic insufficiency, and increased sweat electrolytes (1). The CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene was identified by three groups (2)(3)(4) and was mapped to the long arm of chromosome 7 (7q31). The CFTR contains 24 exons, encodes a protein of 1480 amino acids, functions as a chloride channel, and regulates other transport pathways. Over 900 disease-causing mutations in the CFTR gene have been identified. The American College of Medical Genetics has recommended a core mutation panel for general population CF carrier screening (5). This panel contains 25 of the known CF mutations, including 3120+1G→A and I148T. 3120+1G→A (intron 16) is the second most common CF mutation in the African American population and accounts for 9–14% of the African American CF chromosomes (6). I148T (exon 4) is the second most common CF mutation in the French Canadian population and accounts for 9.1% of the French Canadian CF chromosomes (7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207