Fluxos Migratórios Lusófonos em Direção ao Canadá: O Caso Português e o Brasileiro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is the result of an exploratory research carried out in Montreal – subsidized by the Canadian Government in 2006 – and of the reflections on the relation between the lusophone world and the school in the scope of the Research Group Studies on Migrant Populations in Brazil and in the World: The role of the School supported by CNPq and FAPESP.Arising from the contact with a Portuguese and Brazilian community in Canada, this discussion will approach the social-economic semi-peripheral particularity of Portugal and its colonies – more specifically Brazil. We will point out that although this member of the European Union built the longest colonial empire in the history of mankind, the Portuguese diaspora is evident and Canada has been one of the favorite destinations of the Portuguese. Besides that, we put forth that Brazil bears migrating outflow of qualified labor toward Canada. Finally, in the scope of these lusophone population movements, we will discuss: 1- the role of the school in Montreal’s context regarding the dissemination of the lusophone symbolic heritage: language and culture; 2 – the transfer of Brazilian cultural heritage to Canada by means of a phenomenon called brain drain; axes of discussion in which the relationship between the school and the right to lusophone culture is clearly placed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".