MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1904896785 · doi:10.1111/bjd.14220

Darier disease in Israel: combined evaluation of genetic and neuropsychiatric aspects

2015· article· en· W1904896785 on OpenAlexaff
Roni P. Dodiuk‐Gad, Eran Cohen‐Barak, Morad Khayat, H. Milo, L. Amariglio‐Diskin, N. Danial‐Faran, M. Sah, Michael Ziv, Ayelet Shani‐Adir, Boaz Amichai, Abraham Zlotogorski, Zvi Borochowitz, Dganit Rozenman, Stavit A. Shalev

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and rare skin diseases.
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersLegacy Heritage Fund
KeywordsMedicinePsychiatryDiseaseMood disordersMoodGenodermatosisFamily historyCohortGenetic testingBipolar disorderGenotype-phenotype distinctionGenotypeGeneticsPathologyInternal medicineBiologyGeneAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Darier disease (DD) is a rare genodermatosis caused by heterozygous mutations in the ATP2A2 gene. It has been associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the genetic basis of Israeli patients with DD, and its association with the neuropsychiatric phenotype. METHODS: A cohort of 32 families comprising 74 affected individuals and 13 unaffected family members was recruited from the Haemek Dermatology Department and other dermatology clinics in Israel. The individuals were evaluated by detailed questionnaires, physical examination and genetic analysis. The main outcome measures were genetic mutations, psychiatric profile and their association. RESULTS: Twenty-three mutations in ATP2A2 were scattered over the entire gene, 14 of them novel. Two families shared the same mutation. Twenty-one patients (28%) had a history of psychiatric disorders, most of them mood disorders. Another seven patients (9%) were highly suspected of having a psychiatric disorder; 21 (28%) reported suicidal thoughts and five (7%) had attempted suicide. The psychiatric phenotype demonstrated inter- and intrafamilial variability, and was not associated with disease severity, family history of psychiatric disease or mutation location. CONCLUSIONS: The cohort demonstrated genetic heterogeneity with no mutation cluster along the gene, and a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Although no clear genotype-phenotype correlation was found, the results point to a major effect of genetic background on psychiatric phenotype, together with other modifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicGenetic and rare skin diseases.French-language works237,207