MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905429455 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab72

72 EFFECTS OF GENE EXPRESSION IN BOVINE EMBRYOS RECONSTRUCTED WITH FIBROBLASTS TRANSFECTED WITH LUCIFERASE GENE ON THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT

2004· article· en· W1905429455 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuo Saeki, Tomohiro Tamari, A. Kasamatsu, K Shirouzu, S. Taniguchi, Kazuya Matsumoto, Yoshio Hosoi, A. Iritani

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfectionLuciferaseBlastocystMolecular biologyBiologyEmbryoLipofectamineGene expressionTransgenesisEmbryo cultureEmbryogenesisCell cultureGeneReproductive technologyAndrologyCell biologyRecombinant DNAGeneticsVector (molecular biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During embryo development, embryonic gene activation (EGA) is one of the first critical events. Inappropriate EGA results in failure of further development. We have reported that gene expression in bovine embryos reconstructed with fibroblasts begins at 48 hours postfusion (hpf) and reaches a maximum level at 60 hpf as detected by their bioluminescence following injection of chicken ß-actin/firefly luciferase fusion gene (ß-act/luc+) into their nuclei (Saeki et al., 2001 Theriogenology 55, 289). In the present study, effects of gene expression in embryos reconstructed with bovine fibroblasts transfected with luciferase gene on their subsequent development to the blastocyst stage were examined. Cultured bovine fibroblasts taken from an ear of a female calf were transfected with plasmid containing ß-act/luc+/IRES/EGFP and neor using GeneJammer (StrataGene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Neomycin-resistant cells were selected by culturing with G418. Then, EGFP-positive colonies were further selected under fluorescence microscopy to obtain stably transfected cells. The transfected cells were cultured for several passages. Growing (50 to 60% confluence, GCs) and serum-starved cells (SCs) were used as donor cells. In vitro-matured bovine oocytes derived from slaughterhouse ovaries were enucleated at 20 h post maturation. Enucleated oocytes were electrofused with the cells, and activated with calcium ionophore and cycloheximide. Luminescence in the embryos was detected with an imaging photon counter at 0 and 60 hpf. Luminescence-positive (P) and -negative (N) embryos were cultured separately at each detection time. Embryos were cultured until 168 hpf, and examined for cleavage and blastocyst development. Experiments were repeated 3 times, and totals of 91 and 123 embryos were reconstructed with GCs and SCs, respectively. Data were analyzed with Fisher’s PLSD test following ANOVA by Stat View software (Ver. 5.0). At 0 hpf, luminescence was detected in 55 and 4% of embryos reconstructed with GCs and SCs, respectively. At 60 hpf, luminescence was detected in 47 and 28% of P and N embryos with GCs, and 17 and 40% of P and N embryos with SCs at 0 hpf, respectively. Cleavage rates were not different among groups (P > 0.05). Blastocysts were obtained only from the groups of embryos that were N at 0 hpf and P at 60 hpf (8% with GCs and 17% with SCs). No embryos in the other groups developed to the blastocyst stage. These results suggest that appropriate gene expression in embryos reconstructed with somatic cells is important for their subsequent development and that detecting the reporter gene expression can be used for selection of viable cloned embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207