Livelihood Opportunities Through Informal Housing in the New Capital City of Dodoma, Tanzania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between March 2008 and March 2009 we conducted a desk study and field work on informal and low cost housing endeavours undertaken by building artisans in the new capital city of Dodoma in Tanzania. The study focused on the livelihood opportunities that can be derived from the informal housing building sub-sector as semi-skilled artisans’ grapple with the realities of unmet housing needs of the designated capital city of Tanzania. The argument is that there is a market for construction of low-cost housing in informal settlements in the new capital city even though these settlements are beset with problems of lack of legal tenure, poor infrastructure and sanitation. It is further argued that informal construction work offers possibilities for employment and income earning for semi-skilled artisans. It was felt that a detailed study of informal housing building would provide a better understanding of the key factors and trends affecting the livelihood opportunities of people in the sub-sector and the expectation was that the findings would enlighten on the phenomenon and stimulate policy debates on how the sub-sector can be developed sustainably considering the fate of those concerned. The results show that the sub-sector could contribute immensely in the construction of the new capital city as well as improving the livelihoods of the practitioners if only they were well organised in cooperatives, enabled capacity-wise and training and given legal recognition. Key words: Artisan; Building; Capital; City; Dodoma; Informal; Housing; Livelihoods; Policies; Poverty; Settlements; Sub-sector; SWOT; Tanzania; Theory; Urbanisation; Vulnerability Resume Entre Mars 2008 et Mars 2009, nous avons mene une etude theorique et travail de terrain sur le logement informel et peu de couts efforts entrepris par la construction des artisans dans la nouvelle capitale de Dodoma en Tanzanie. L'etude a porte sur les moyens de subsistance qui peut etre derive de la construction de logements informels sous-secteur de s'attaquer semi-qualifies des artisans avec les realites des besoins de logement non satisfaits de la capitale designe de la Tanzanie. L'argument est qu'il ya un marche pour la construction de logements a bas prix dans des etablissements informels dans la nouvelle capitale, meme si ces etablissements sont en proie a des problemes de manque de tenure legale, la mediocrite des infrastructures et l'assainissement. Il est en outre soutenu que les travaux de construction informelle offre des possibilites d'emploi et de revenus pour les artisans semi-qualifies. On a estime qu'une etude detaillee de la construction de logements informels permettrait une meilleure comprehension des facteurs cles et les tendances affectant la possibilites de subsistance des populations dans le sous-secteur et l'attente etait que les resultats seraient eclairer sur le phenomene et de stimuler les debats politiques sur comment le sous-secteur peut etre developpe de facon durable considerer le sort des personnes concernees. Les resultats montrent que le sous-secteur pourrait contribuer enormement a la construction de la nouvelle capitale, ainsi que l'amelioration de la subsistance des praticiens, si seulement ils etaient bien organises en cooperatives, ont permis le renforcement des sages et de formation et une reconnaissance juridique. Mots-cles : Artisan; Bâtiment; Capitaux; Ville; Dodoma; Informelles; Logement; Les moyens de subsistance; Les politiques; La pauvrete; Les colonies; Sous-secteur; SWOT; Tanzanie; Theorie; L'urbanisation; La vulnerabilite
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".