Mediação do conhecimento para o acesso à informação: reflexão baseada em uma perspectiva sociológica da ciência da informação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reflexão a respeito da complexidade da CI em seu caráter social na mediação para o acesso à informação. Discute a produção do conhecimento nas interações sociais, sua legitimação, institucionalização e a constituição das disciplinas científicas. Aborda a questão do fluxo que se dá entre o conhecimento produzido por determinada disciplina científica, a atuação da CI na reconstrução desse conhecimento por meio da representação da informação, e as implicações do acesso a essa informação por pesquisadores. A ênfase dessa reflexão recai, principalmente, no último estágio desse fluxo, considerando-se que o usuário (pesquisador) pauta sua abordagem de busca à informação nas significações e linguagem da disciplina e na sua cultura de seu contexto científico. Considera que, para o efetivo fluxo da informação, é relevante, na representação da informação enquanto mediação, a aplicação da estrutura lógicosemântica da linguagem do grupo social da qual o usuário pertence e pauta suas necessidades informacionais.Palavras-chaveOrganização do conhecimento. Organização da informação. Representação do conhecimento. Representação da informação. Ciência da informação.Knowledge mediation for information access: reflection based on a sociological perspective of the Information ScienceAbstractThe objective of this paper is to present a reflection on the complexity of Information Science (IS) with reference to its social mediation for access to information. Knowledge production in social interactions is discussed as well as legitimization and constitution of scientific disciplines. The issue of flow of knowledge produced by a scientific discipline is also analyzed as well as the role of IS in the reconstruction of this knowledge through the information representation and the implications of the access to that information by researchers. Special emphasis of this reflection is pointed out in the last flow stage taking into consideration that the user (researcher) guides his approach to information search according to the meaning and language of the discipline and culture of the scientific context. The effective information flow is important for information representation as a mediation as applied to the logic-semantic structure of the language of the social group which the user belongs to and the information needs are based on.KeywordsKnowledge organization. Information organization. Knowledge representation. Information representation. Information Science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.030 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".