Stemflow and throughfall contributions to soil water recharge under trees with differing branch architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Trees whose branches slope towards or away from the bole differ in the spatial pattern of water delivery to the soil surface beneath their canopies. This study examines the implications of these differences for soil water recharge below 1 m depth in a managed forest on the Oak Ridges Moraine in southern Ontario. Throughfall and vertical profiles of soil water content at varying distances from the boles of a sugar maple and two red pines of differing ages (36 and 57 years old) were measured during rainfall inputs in the summer of 2009 and in the spring/early summer of 2010. Stemflow fluxes were estimated using measurements on nearby trees with similar morphologies. A water balance approach was used to estimate recharge at each distance from the bole, as well as for the entire sampled area beneath each tree's canopy. Throughfall was more than 1.3 times above‐canopy rainfall within 0.5 m of the bole of the sugar maple, and stemflow volumes were at least an order‐of‐magnitude greater than those for the pines in both 2009 and 2010. These focused inputs resulted in greater near‐bole soil water contents and soil water recharge in excess of above‐canopy rainfall within 0.3 m of the sugar maple bole. In contrast, both young and old pines showed no significant trends in throughfall with distance from the bole, and minor stemflow volumes made insignificant contributions to recharge near the pine boles. Recharge was significantly greater than 0 beneath the canopy of all three trees in both years and was generally similar between trees. The exception was recharge beneath the sugar maple in 2010, which exceeded that of the young red pine as a result of the former's large stemflow fluxes. Results suggest the transition from red pine plantations to mixed hardwood‐conifer stands will not alter total soil water recharge during spring and summer rainfall inputs; nevertheless, it will generate marked changes in the spatial pattern of sub‐canopy recharge in this forest landscape on the Oak Ridges Moraine. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".