Exact solution of the unsteady Krook kinetic model and nonequilibrium thermodynamic study for a rarefied gas affected by a nonlinear thermal radiation field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A development of the previous paper (J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 36, 75 (2011)) is introduced. The nonstationary Krook kinetic equation model for a rarefied gas affected by nonlinear thermal radiation field is solved, instead of the stationary equation. In a frame comoving with the fluid, analytically the Bhatnager–Gross–Krook model kinetic equation is applied. The travelling wave solution method is used to get the exact solution of the nonlinear partial differential equations. These equations were produced from applying the moment method to the unsteady Boltzmann equation. Now we should solve nonlinear partial differential equations in place of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, which represent an arduous task. The unsteady solution gives the problem a great generality and more applications. The new problem is investigated to follow the behavior of the macroscopic properties of the gas, such as the temperature and concentration. They are substituted into the corresponding two-stream maxiwallian distribution functions permitting us to investigate the nonequilibrium thermodynamic properties of the system (gas particles + the heated plate). The entropy, entropy flux, entropy production, thermodynamic forces, and kinetic coefficients are obtained. We investigate the verification of the Boltzmann H-theorem, Le Chatelier principle, the second law of thermodynamic and the celebrated Onsager's reciprocity relation for the system. The ratios between the different contributions of the internal energy changes based upon the total derivatives of the extensive parameters are estimated via the Gibbs formula. The results are applied to helium gas for various radiation field intensities due to different plate temperatures. Graphics illustrating the calculated variables are drawn to predict their behavior and the results are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".