MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1907935837 · doi:10.5858/2001-125-0935-pcotmt

Papillary Carcinoma of Thyroid Metastatic to the Pituitary Gland

2001· article· en· W1907935837 on OpenAlexaff
C. David Bell, Kálmán Kovács, Éva Horváth, Harley Smythe, L. Sylvia

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPapillary carcinomaThyroidPituitary glandPathologyMedicineCarcinomaEndocrine glandMetastatic carcinomaThyroid carcinomaInternal medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a 35-year-old woman who presented with diabetes insipidus caused by metastatic papillary carcinoma of the thyroid involving the pituitary gland, 25 years after treatment for a papillary carcinoma of thyroid and 17 years after treatment for multiple pulmonary metastases. The literature contains 10 previously described cases of metastatic thyroid carcinoma involving the sella, but only 2 of these cases had unequivocal metastases to the pituitary gland, making the present case, to our knowledge, the third reported case of unequivocal hematogenous metastasis of thyroid carcinoma to the pituitary gland. The pituitary tumor was removed by transsphenoidal surgery, and the tissue was examined by conventional histology, extensive immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. The findings confirmed the tumor to be papillary thyroid carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the first report citing use of thyroid transcription factor-1 to establish a thyroid source of a pituitary metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207