MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1908071174 · doi:10.1159/000439448

Re-Sequencing of the <b><i>APOL1</i></b>-<b><i>APOL4</i></b> and <b><i>MYH9</i></b> Gene Regions in African Americans Does Not Identify Additional Risks for CKD Progression

2015· article· en· W1908071174 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory A. Hawkins, David J. Friedman, Lingyi Lu, David R. McWilliams, Jeff W. Chou, Satria P. Sajuthi, Jasmin Divers, Rulan S. Parekh, Man Li, Giulio Genovese, Martin R. Pollack, Donald W. Bowden, Lijun Ma, Barry I. Freedman, Carl D. Langefeld

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Nephrology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesWake Forest School of MedicineNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsEnd-stage kidney diseaseMedicineDiabetic nephropathyNephropathyKidney diseaseAlleleDiabetes mellitusGeneBiologyInternal medicineGenotypeEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In African Americans (AAs), <i>APOL1</i> G1 and G2 nephropathy risk variants are associated with non-diabetic end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in an autosomal recessive pattern. Additional risk and protective genetic variants may be present near the <i>APOL1</i> loci, since earlier age ESKD is observed in some AAs with one <i>APOL1</i> renal-risk variant, and because the adjacent gene <i>MYH9</i> is associated with nephropathy in populations lacking G1 and G2 variants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Re-sequencing was performed across a ∼275 kb region encompassing the <i>APOL1-APOL4</i> and <i>MYH9</i> genes in 154 AA cases with non-diabetic ESKD and 38 controls without nephropathy who were heterozygous for a single <i>APOL1</i> G1 or G2 risk variant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sequencing identified 3,246 non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 55 coding SNPs, and 246 insertion/deletions. No new coding variations were identified. Eleven variants, including a rare <i>APOL3</i> Gln<sup>58</sup>Ter null variant (rs11089781), were genotyped in a replication panel of 1,571 AA ESKD cases and 1,334 controls. After adjusting for <i>APOL1</i> G1 and G2 risk effects, these variations were not significantly associated with ESKD. In subjects with <2 <i>APOL1</i> G1 and/or G2 alleles (849 cases; 1,139 controls), the <i>APOL3</i> null variant was nominally associated with ESKD (recessive model, OR 1.81; p = 0.026); however, analysis in 807 AA cases and 634 controls from the Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes did not replicate this association. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Additional common variants in the <i>APOL1-APOL4</i>-<i>MYH9</i> region do not contribute significantly to ESKD risk beyond the <i>APOL1</i> G1 and G2 alleles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.014
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NephrologySame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207