MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1908321730

국외 역사교육의 ‘역사의식’ 연구동향과 그 시사점

2012· article· ko· W1908321730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
尹鍾弼, 朴賢淑

Bibliographic record

Venue역사교육 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsciousnessSubject (documents)Historicity (philosophy)EpistemologySociologyTypologyHistorical thinkingContingencyHistoryLawPhilosophyAnthropologyPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to provide diverse approaches to historical consciousness with the help of studies on the subject in other countries. Especially in Canada and the United States, historical consciousness has emerged as an important subject in history education. Jorn Rusen, who is one of the leading scholars in this field, has suggested four types of historical consciousness, namely traditional, exemplary, critical and generic. And they basically form an ascending linear progression. His focus is on the connection between the development of historical consciousness and moral judgments. Working on Rusen’s scheme, Peter Seixas has given a more systematic arrangement to the four types. Seixas can be differentiated from Rusen in that while the former puts what he calls ‘historical epistemology’ at the center of the development of historical consciousness, the latter categorizes the forms of historical consciousness mainly in terms of substantive knowledge about the past. Peter Lee, without denying the merits of Rusen’s study, makes a critical point that Rusen’s typology does not fully take into account students’ metahistorical ideas, that is to say their ideas of the discipline of history. In Lee’s opinion, history education needs to emphasize the development of students’ metahistorical thinking. Jurgen Straub, among many other things, tackles the problem of whether historical consciousness is an anthropological universal or a historical product. Straub gravitates towards its historical aspects and argues that modern historical consciousness is related to being aware of historicity and contingency of our world. Lastly Sam Wineburg, with the help of the study of collective memory by Maurice Halbwachs, shows that several elements such as family, community, mass media, and others are in play in the development of students’ historical consciousness. And he suggests that researchers see school history education in the context of the ‘cultural curriculum’ and realize its importance in the shaping of students’ consciousness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue역사교육Same topicEducator Training and Historical PedagogyFrench-language works237,207