Carbon Sequestration and Enhanced Recovery Potential of Mature Coalbed Methane Reservoirs in the Black Warrior Basin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mature coalbed methane reservoirs are prospective as major sinks for anthropogenic CO 2, and injection of CO 2shows promise for increasing coalbed methane reserves through enhanced recovery. Assessment of the carbon sequestration and enhanced recovery potential of coal in the Black Warrior basin indicates that numerous geological variables, including stratigraphy, structure, hydrology, geothermics, and coal quality, have a strong impact on the quantity of carbon that can be sequestered. Key variables affecting the feasibility of sequestration and enhanced recovery in the Black Warrior basin include (1) the distribution of mineable coal, (2) the distribution of formation water saline enough for underground injection, and (3) the distribution of structural compartments with sufficient reservoir continuity to host multiple five-spot well patterns. Within the developed coalbed methane fields, the feasible CO 2sequestration potential is estimated to be 166 Bscm (5.9 Tscf), or 341 MMt, which can facilitate long-term sequestration of CO 2emissions from coal-fired power plants. The potential for enhanced coalbed methane recovery in this area is estimated to be between 16 and 30 Bscm (0.6 and 1.1 Tscf), and realization of this potential would expand proven coalbed methane reserves by more than 30%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it